It was definitely a penalty though.gangrenous wrote: ↑July 6, 2023, 8:25 am Tino can’t be sin binned when his actions didn’t actually prevent the quick tap. Kris (wasn’t it Kris?) still has to wait around for a Raider to be back on side, meaning there was no delay for the Raiders.
Whoever it was should get a rocket if they weren’t injured or obstructed. Because I agree it cost us a sin binned titan.
Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Moderator: GH Moderators
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
The Pork got something wrong again?gangrenous wrote: ↑July 6, 2023, 8:25 am Tino can’t be sin binned when his actions didn’t actually prevent the quick tap. Kris (wasn’t it Kris?) still has to wait around for a Raider to be back on side, meaning there was no delay for the Raiders.
Whoever it was should get a rocket if they weren’t injured or obstructed. Because I agree it cost us a sin binned titan.
I don't believe it!
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
- El_Capitano
- Brett Mullins
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: May 30, 2014, 1:25 pm
- Favourite Player: Mal Meninga
- Location: Sydney
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
I don’t know if he did get it wrong, the ref couldn’t know at the time of the interference if our players would get back onside by the time Kris gets to the 20m.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How soon IS now?
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
He got it right. It’s good refereeing to let that play out.
Not to mention the interference coming back was 50/50. The second interference after it was tapped made it a guaranteed penalty and imo a mandatory sin bin had the Raiders been entitled to tap it.
Not to mention the interference coming back was 50/50. The second interference after it was tapped made it a guaranteed penalty and imo a mandatory sin bin had the Raiders been entitled to tap it.
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
50/50?! He went smack bang directly into Kris to stop him.gangrenous wrote: ↑July 6, 2023, 9:11 pm He got it right. It’s good refereeing to let that play out.
Not to mention the interference coming back was 50/50. The second interference after it was tapped made it a guaranteed penalty and imo a mandatory sin bin had the Raiders been entitled to tap it.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Yet it had absolutely zero impact on the game.
Maybe I should watch it again. But my impression live was that he hadn’t realised Kris had taken it in goal and that he was going to stop him and then someone called out or he figured it out and didn’t go on with it. Then since there was no detrimental impact on the Raiders the ref let it slide.
Maybe I should watch it again. But my impression live was that he hadn’t realised Kris had taken it in goal and that he was going to stop him and then someone called out or he figured it out and didn’t go on with it. Then since there was no detrimental impact on the Raiders the ref let it slide.
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
gangrenous wrote: ↑July 6, 2023, 9:26 pm Yet it had absolutely zero impact on the game.
Maybe I should watch it again. But my impression live was that he hadn’t realised Kris had taken it in goal and that he was going to stop him and then someone called out or he figured it out and didn’t go on with it. Then since there was no detrimental impact on the Raiders the ref let it slide.
- Seiffert82
- Mal Meninga
- Posts: 28325
- Joined: March 17, 2007, 12:24 pm
- Favourite Player: Bay56
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Haha, yeah Tino knew exactly what he was doing. The ref just had his back turned.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Went back and watched and I stand by what I said.
With the shots available we can’t really tell what happens with Tino. But he appears relatively stationary, with Kris catching a shoulder on the way past. Relatively light, definitely 50/50 if that for a penalty.
The worse block comes from Randall who actively tries to block, but appears genuinely confused. Looks like the ref might be calling him off and he hasn’t figured out why.
Given it seems genuinely a mistake for the major component I think it’s good refereeing to not blow a penalty before confirming it was detrimental to the attacking team.
With the shots available we can’t really tell what happens with Tino. But he appears relatively stationary, with Kris catching a shoulder on the way past. Relatively light, definitely 50/50 if that for a penalty.
The worse block comes from Randall who actively tries to block, but appears genuinely confused. Looks like the ref might be calling him off and he hasn’t figured out why.
Given it seems genuinely a mistake for the major component I think it’s good refereeing to not blow a penalty before confirming it was detrimental to the attacking team.
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
I think we could forgive Tino for brushing Kris, but Randall very clearly attempts to tackle Kris! He even wraps the arms, attempted to tackle front on. It's an obvious penalty. The referee might have thought... let's play on and see what happens. But when there is no advantage in playing on, the referee must go back for such a blatant offence. The only excuse might be the referee thought there was more advantage in allowing a seven tackle set and a 20 metre tap...
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
But the penalty is for obstructing the player getting to make the quick tap. Which he made with spare time. So there’s nothing really to penalise.
Also as I say based on body language it appears to have been without intent.
Also as I say based on body language it appears to have been without intent.
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Intent is irrelevant. Impossible to even conclude it given he wraps the arms. The bottom line is you can’t obstruct a player trying to take a quick tap. It’s a penalty every day.gangrenous wrote:But the penalty is for obstructing the player getting to make the quick tap. Which he made with spare time. So there’s nothing really to penalise.
Also as I say based on body language it appears to have been without intent.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
You seem to be ignoring the bit where he makes no difference to what happens. Therefore there is no obstruction.
The intent is pretty clear from the body language in my opinion. Not that he wasn’t trying to tackle Kris (he was), but he wasn’t trying to deliberately prevent a quick tap(he clearly had no idea why people were yelling at him).
The intent is pretty clear from the body language in my opinion. Not that he wasn’t trying to tackle Kris (he was), but he wasn’t trying to deliberately prevent a quick tap(he clearly had no idea why people were yelling at him).
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
It doesn't matter. The first offence applies. "Intent" doesn't matter. Players don't mean to pick up the ball in an offside position. Or maybe they do. It's still a penalty. You can't really assess the intent. You cannot tackle the player attempting to take a quick tap. It's a black and white offence.gangrenous wrote: ↑July 7, 2023, 4:18 pm You seem to be ignoring the bit where he makes no difference to what happens. Therefore there is no obstruction.
The intent is pretty clear from the body language in my opinion. Not that he wasn’t trying to tackle Kris (he was), but he wasn’t trying to deliberately prevent a quick tap(he clearly had no idea why people were yelling at him).
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Not the same.
Whether I mean to or not, playing the ball in an offside position disadvantages the opposition.
Intent *does* matter in the case of offside in assessing severity, so I don’t think that aids your position.
Whether I mean to or not, playing the ball in an offside position disadvantages the opposition.
Intent *does* matter in the case of offside in assessing severity, so I don’t think that aids your position.
Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
You haven’t even tried GE!
What was the disadvantage to the Raiders?
What was the disadvantage to the Raiders?
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
While I’m at it I should make a full pitch for arseclown of the week.
Yes Raiders win a 10-6 record are legitimately ahead of a 10-7 team with one fewer bye. The other team has played an extra game and definitely lost. Raiders have an extra game to play where they can win and go 11-6, while if they lose in the worst case they’re still level at 10-7.
But on a serious note, love the podcast and always listen
Yes Raiders win a 10-6 record are legitimately ahead of a 10-7 team with one fewer bye. The other team has played an extra game and definitely lost. Raiders have an extra game to play where they can win and go 11-6, while if they lose in the worst case they’re still level at 10-7.
But on a serious note, love the podcast and always listen
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
No show this week sorry.
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Out Now Episode 122 - An Ambush Awaits!
Listen
Listen
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Thanks for the pod
Didn’t do your research on the negative F/A top 4 spot though. GE reported here that Cowboys in 2007 were the first to do that. Finished 3rd with a differential of -71!
Didn’t do your research on the negative F/A top 4 spot though. GE reported here that Cowboys in 2007 were the first to do that. Finished 3rd with a differential of -71!
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
I’ve *checked notes* and see the Cowboys had scores of 44, 54, 58, and 64 put on them that year. Incredible they finished 3rd with that level of defence!gangrenous wrote: ↑July 20, 2023, 8:45 am Thanks for the pod
Didn’t do your research on the negative F/A top 4 spot though. GE reported here that Cowboys in 2007 were the first to do that. Finished 3rd with a differential of -71!
Ata Mariota’s #1 fan. Bless his cotton socks.
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
On Trevilyan. Given the severity of the injuries he’s returning from we can’t expect him to come back where he was at. Unfortunately it’s probably more in 12 months time when we can assess if he’s got it, or if the injuries have been too damaging.
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Cheers. Will definitely bring it up if I can remember.gangrenous wrote:Thanks for the pod
Didn’t do your research on the negative F/A top 4 spot though. GE reported here that Cowboys in 2007 were the first to do that. Finished 3rd with a differential of -71!
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Out Now Episode 123 - Another Knightmare?
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Out Now Episode 124 - Bateman Returns
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Was the NRLW result mentioned?
- gangrenous
- Laurie Daley
- Posts: 16803
- Joined: May 12, 2007, 10:42 pm
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Ooh I was the highly coveted listener of the week?!
I had a shocker of a week and only got to listen to the first half of last weeks ep ahead of the Knights game. Was tragic fan enough to go back and listen despite getting mauled, but nearly missed it!
I had a shocker of a week and only got to listen to the first half of last weeks ep ahead of the Knights game. Was tragic fan enough to go back and listen despite getting mauled, but nearly missed it!
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Out Now Episode 125 - Strange Days
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Ethan Strange joined the Raiders last year, not this year…
viewtopic.php?t=35027
Initially signed for 2023, but released to the Raiders during 2022.
Poor Paul Crawley…
viewtopic.php?t=35027
Initially signed for 2023, but released to the Raiders during 2022.
Poor Paul Crawley…
Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Glad to see I was able to illustrate my own point that not many people know much about Ethan Strange.
I’m glad I got the Central Coast part right at least.
I’m glad I got the Central Coast part right at least.
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Out Now Episode 126 - Sour Times
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Out Now Episode 127 - The Club Loves A Hooker
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Re: Raiders Review with Blake and The Pork
Out Now Episode 128 - Rugby League Has Died
Raiders Review With Blake and The Pork Podcast
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg
Listen https://soundcloud.com/blake-budak
iTunes https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/r ... 1395930852
Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6I7wTzqgn ... es7B1aYEgg